SBGK;681718 Wrote: > very funny, I upsampled my hearing > > slipped the SBT back on after the statement above. The Linn has quite > an attractive sound, different to the SBT, more of a staged sound which > I suppose is what you get with Linn sources. Back to the SBT, I am just > very impressed with it after the Linn, no real signature sound, just > gives loads of detail and rhythm, plenty of bass, a more open sound, > but very enjoyable. > Eric Clapton Backless 16/44 used for comparison. > > I used to play this on a record player and the SBT reminds me more of > that sound, great dynamic range. > > if there is any hardness to the treble I think that is an attribute of > the SBT and the only way round it is a hardware mod, which is why I am > sending it away.
Hardness of treble is not there anymore on my SBT with my settings and I can even now enjoy listening to bright Beyer's Four Season recording without fatigue... and it beats my NAD c515 Cd player. -- evdplancke ------------------------------------------------------------------------ evdplancke's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43147 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
