soundcheck;687111 Wrote: > > Checkout the 'Anedio DAC' > (http://www.anedio.com/index.php/article/squeezebox_touch) page. Those > guys try their best to clean up the incoming signal first before it's > send to the DAC chip. > You'll find some interesting graphs about Touch vs. Anedio DAC over > there. They also talk about Jitter measurements etc. > > > I'd love to find a DAC/input stage which is immune on incoming > distortions. My Touch Toolbox project would finally come to an end. I > don't see light at the end of the tunnel yet. > > Enjoy. I don´t get your point. The link simply proves that the Touch with a good DAC does a perfect job, in this case their D1-DAC.
They even clearly state there is no difference on the Touch feeded by wireless, SD or USB drive because the internal buffering on the Touch must work flawlessly :) Getting 20dB better specs on digital silence when upsampled is no magic, it doesn´t play a role on music. So their DAC has better analog specs. That shouldn´t be a surprise. All this doesn´t prove the Touchs digital out doesn´t do as well with other DACs. -- Wombat Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93302
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
