item_audio;693111 Wrote: > Some of the claims made by the TAS article, however, do seem to cross > the line and imply something either revolutionary or crazy. Then again > I can't see how that could be true might only indicate a lack of > imagination, and doesn't allow for future variables. Is it not better > to reserve judgment than look an idiot in hindsight?
Would you care to say which of their claims, in your opinion, have crossed this line, and why those particular claims stand out? Is it perhaps their claim that WAV-FLAC-WAV degrades the sound, or maybe that identical files produced by different rippers can sound different? After all, all of this claptrap is supported by the same level of 'evidence'. At what point do you personally start to question this 'evidence'? -- chill ------------------------------------------------------------------------ chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10839 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93549
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
