ralphpnj;697227 Wrote: 
> If future proofing one's purchase is a major concern then the Touch is
> the better choice because using the digital outputs one can then
> upgrade to almost any external DAC, even one with balanced analog
> outputs, or upgrade to almost any home theater receiver. Mind you, I'm
> not knocking the Transporter, it's just that the Touch is a more
> "future proof" device.

+1!

As a player into an external DAC the Touch is an excellent platform,
capable of delivering superb sound.

Even when used with its own internal DAC, it ain't chopped liver, by
any means.

And for the money, it's a bargain to boot.

Guido F.


-- 
guidof

MUSIC ROOM:
Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge->Conrad Johnson
Motif preamp
Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player->Cambridge Azur 840C DAC
Vortexbox Appliance->WiFi Bridge->Squeezebox Touch->Toslink->Cambridge
Azur 840C DAC->Adcom GFP-750 preamp->Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp
-> Martin Logan SL3s
DSpeaker Antimode 8033->REL T1 Sub
BEDROOM:
Squeezebox Touch (analog out)->Little Dot Mk III amp->AKG K701
headphones
SECOND BEDROOM:
Squeezebox Touch->Grado SR125 headphones
------------------------------------------------------------------------
guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94253

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to