rgro;698616 Wrote: > While I agree, in principle, that there are unanswered questions, I also > don't ever recall seeing an official Logitech response/explanation of > this particular issue, either. Which is why I asked for one in my > other post. > > I don't see why it would be such a huge deal if, in fact, Logitech were > to tell us that the priority and buffer settings were possibly not > "tuned" to the absolute optimum values. After, all, there must be, > literally, 1,000's of possible combinations of those settings. The > designer/engineers would have only had so much time to devote to fine > tuning them. That people in this community might have both the time > and inclination to play around with more alternatives than was possible > for Logitech to do, internally, would not seem to cast any aspersions on > Logitech's capabilities. > > And, certainly, there is lots of precedent here for 3rd parties to > improve the product where Logitech didn't have the available resources > (Triode's USB work being a recent and prime example) to devote.
I can only speak for myself, but if it wasn't for Soundcheck's TT3.0, I would today be a proud owner of the Transporter. I was looking for that 'next step up' for my digital transport, not feeling that SBT is good enough. However, after applying TT3.0, and then learning how to do subsequent tweaking free of charge, I've realized that SBT pretty much gets me to where I'd be if I purchased Transporter. So Logitech lost the sale... the rest is history... -- magiccarpetride ------------------------------------------------------------------------ magiccarpetride's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37863 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
