darrell;698981 Wrote: > There seems to be a misunderstanding here - A double blind test is not > so called because you are testing 2 alternatives. It is "double blind" > because neither the person or persons taking part in the test, nor the > organiser of the test know which of the alternatives is in play at any > one time. > > For example, when testing drugs, neither the patient nor the doctor > administering the treatment know whether they are dealing with the real > thing or the placebo. The purpose is to eliminate involuntary verbal and > non-verbal clues being picked up by the patient.
Just to be clear, the testing I participated in yesterday wasn't double blind or very scientific in any way. We were two persons, and one of us did the switcing between the two SBTs. We took turns listening. After five in a row with the factory SBT connected to WLAN as the best sounding it was clear enough for us. Others may need more proof, and I won't loose any sleep if people still thinks that TT3.0 makes an improvement in their systems :) Regards -- NoRoDa ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NoRoDa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=49139 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
