rgro wrote: > Aw, c'mon why so serious? Because the rational answer (and how to reach it) matters. Even when the question is trivial.
rgro wrote: > And, back to the original point I took issue with: were everyone that > has contributed to aeronautics imbued with your philosophy that "If you > don't expect a tweak to make a change, you're not very likely to apply > the tweak", I don't believe we'd have had anywhere near the progress (in > aeronautics, electronics, or anything else, for that matter) that we > enjoy. Okay, then please explain me this: If the first flying machine builders didn't expect their tweaks to make a change, then -why did they do them-? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Soulkeeper's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35297 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94770 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
