Mnyb wrote: 
> It is not it is 24/48 , however if server is up to it 24/192 will be
> transcoded to 24/48 so you can keep enjoying the music .
> 
> You could get a Touch for the more critical listening locations it does
> 24/96 , it has better spdiff implementation than reciever .
> If you hear any real difference it is more likely to be due to this not
> the 48/96 diff.
> So in some cases Touch can be better on all material including 16/44.1 (
> well it is technically better, but if it is audible is an implementation
> thing in those rare cases )
> 
> However Triode is finalising a very nice third party app that gives
> Touch 24/192 and USB if needed, for people with async USB DAC's and 192k
> spdiff if one does not want( can't) run transcoding on the server .

+1 on all counts.

When the Touch was first available I replaced a SB Receiver with a
Touch. Both units were/are connected via the digital output to an
external DAC and there was/is a vast improvement in the sound quality
between the Receiver and the Touch. So Mnyb is quite correct in stating
that upgrading to a Touch when used in a critical listening location is
a very good idea.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94871

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to