It is possible that in your newer DAC they did in fact improve it: improving the PLL circuitry *could* have the effect of not allowing it to get lock over as wide a frequency range, but rather it more tenaciously maintains the first frequency it locked on. You have found the dark side of it.
When it was designed, people probably didn't much move from 44.1/48 to 96 in one session, more likely 44 to 48 would have been common. Just my speculation... Sorry, I don't really understand your question. I'm not familiar with *any* of the gear you mention, I was only speaking generally. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cfraser's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48869 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94260 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
