cfraser wrote: > In the audiophile world (parallel universe...), ASRC is kin to satan. > Just kin though. i.e. 88.2kHz->96kHz sample rate > > If somebody sold 96/24 downloads that had ASRC previously applied to > them, they'd sure hear about it, and so would just about everyone else. > It's not easy to hide if you look. What someone does with their music > files in the privacy of their own homes...a different matter. If ASRC > helps you as a workaround, that's good too, just not preferred. [This is > not the same as some other lossless data conversions the Touch/LMS can > do, where data is converted 1:1 and nothing is "made up"/interpolated.] > > And BTW, this would of course solve the OP's particular problem, though > soulkeeper's idea is preferred, if it works.
I was under the impression that it was tricky to find a file that won't have had its sample rate converted on multiple occasions, and not necessarily by integer multiples, during the recording, mastering , production side. The audiophile world is crazy town; lots of people with delta sigma dacs, digital volume controls digital filters blah blah blah worry about keeping the data pure. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94260 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
