SoftwireEngineer wrote: > Awesome..you did it . Archimago - BTW, did you label the graphs wrongly > ?. Looks to me the Toslink is better than coax (the base is wider with > coax). Or I dont know to read the graph ..
Nope, the labeling is correct. From the perspective of data-correlated sidebands, the TosLink seems to be worse. There is however more "spectral spreading" of the central tone in the coaxial input. That's what I was referring to when I mentioned the "base" was widened for the coaxial inputs. I'm unclear why the "spectral purity" of the coaxial input signal seems worse than TosLink in this regard or the interplay with these measured sidebands. Anyone help explain this? BTW: Last week while measuring the Transporter, I ran the 16/44 J-Test signal... Though not the same as the 24/48 one for the Touch, it's comparable. 14450 Now that's a clean trace! +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Filename: Transporter_-_NOTE_16-44.jpg | |Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=14450| +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97950 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
