Archimago wrote: > Oi. > > Speaking of those TAS computer audio articles from early 2012, does > anyone subscribe and know if there were many nasty letters to the editor > on all that craziness (or would they not even print critical letters)?
I do subscribe. I do seem to remember one letter asking some questions (and not in the right area) and the authors basically said they got it right, and it's left to the doubters to explain why they heard a difference. What I'm really seeing is that neither TAS nor Stereophile really have a truly digital-savvy editor, so no one challenges what the authors, or letter writers, submit. I mean, let's face it, publishing a letter that basically says that in a rigorous test, sonic character got added converting from flac to wav is pretty embarrassing. As one friend put it, "I'm sure they also believe if they print out a photo and scan it at higher resolution, it will get better." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EricBergan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4746 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98630 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
