Mnyb wrote: > In this actual case there is facts , no needs to use poor analogies. > > Fact . There is no difference in sound between FLAC and WAV . > There is not even a plausible mechanism for it . > > Other forum members likearchimago have even measure the the transporter > in this regard. > The electrical signal that comes out are identical . > > That'd age no other explanation than what's going on in the mind . > Given the complexity of a mind vs some tech... > > You actually have your imagined cake and eat it to . > transcode FLAC to PCM at the server ( any old nas might not have the CPU > for it ). > > I don't get where the poor analogies fit OP is limiting himself to poor > metadata support etc , because he believes WAV sound better > if he stopped doing that he whole collection of music would be easier to > manage. > And enjoyment would increase :) > > In fact this tread is about solving the wrong problem , the answer is > don't use WAV .
Nice but FACTS are completely irrelevant to an audiophile. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98630 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
