Mnyb wrote: 
> There are also artistic choices done by the mixing engineer and
> producer.
> 
> A modern recording may be beyond reproach technically , but the actual
> sounds put on to it may sound as you discribe .
> Some one else on this forum made the remark that some 50's microphones
> had a bit of a hot shouty sound of thier own :) etc.
> 
> The old record may have noise distortion and limited frequency response
> , you may not hear what they actually produced , but enough of it is
> there for us to enjoy . The made production decision that where more to
> your liking .
> 
> This is my pow that the media is almost unimportant , the actual playing
> ,recording ,producing makes the record.
> Not if it happens to be a cd , lp , cassette , or hirez file .
> Audiophiles often obsess over the carrier format, hence why HD tracks
> seem to able to (re)sell any thing ?
> 
> I should actually explore more of this music , it's actually missing in
> my collection :)
> That's nice with this forum some one always talk about interesting music
> even in treads not directly about it .

It could also be that my ears are more used to the old school sound?
Perhaps the new 'brickwalled' sound is an acquired taste?

All I know is that I tend to cringe when I hear many of the recently
produced tracks. Going back to the old CDs etc., I breathe a sigh of
relief. Suddenly everything begins to sound like music again:) If I then
switch over to the newly produced music, I feel like I've been shoved
into a crappy night club:(


------------------------------------------------------------------------
heisenberg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59622
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98650

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to