bakker_be wrote: 
> As I was reading 'this post on metal-fi'
> (http://www.metal-fi.com/dynamics-the-numbers-game/) I came across 'this
> link on Sound-on-Sound'
> (http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/sep11/articles/loudness.htm). At first
> read it seems a plausible explanation, but can we really "all" be wrong?

I think that it shows the current audiophile fixation on a single "DR"
measure is misguided - actually looking at clipping and hard limiting
tells us more about the quality of a mastering. Limited dynamic range is
an artistic choice, but trying to exceed the maximum amplitude when you
have 16 or 24 bits worth of amplitude resolution is just bad use of your
tools.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98729

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to