netchord wrote: > no, i'm a music lover. used the wine analogy earlier, but if two > different cabs taste differently, and have different noses, are you > suggesting i shouldn't believe what my senses tell me, without > subjecting the wine tasting to rigorous chemical analysis? > > or, should i perhaps just enjoy the fucking wine that I like better? > > and btw, i think it's clear from your equipment list that you and I > *hear* things differently. by way of example, I've had the DAC 1 in my > system, and listened to it extensively. I found it unlistenable, hard, > bright, brittle- like nails on a chalkboard. > > you seem to like it. i say you're wrong. you can test to your heart's > content, and nothing will make me like the way it sounds. > > however, i keep an open mind re the DAC 2.
Ouch. You've now resorted to the audiophile phase of personal attack and "my stuff is better than yours". You should lie down and take a nap. It's only a forum. It's not the real world. And somehow you either don't understand the points I and others have made about biases and testing or you understand but simply refuse to accept the concept. That's OK. There are many people around that refuse to believe in science and that doesn't make them bad people--just uninformed. p.s. I like the Transporter DAC better than the Benchmark DAC I. That's why I moved my Benchmark to the weekend house and use the Transporter in my main system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98630 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
