mlsstl wrote: 
> Can't comment on the MDAC, but I had been using a SB3 with a Lavry DAC
> when I got my Touch 3 years ago. I ran them side-by-side, synced and
> level-matched for a couple of weeks. I found that I generally could not
> tell a difference, and when I could, it was so subtle as to not be worth
> fretting about. I sold the Lavry and haven't looked back since.

1. Level matched .

2. Reasonably well performing DAC's ,(error below human treshold of
hearing)

Expected results .

However that can be said about most of your line level components .

But things adds up in the end , so having better performing components
is good even if that single component cant be distinguished in isolation
, but the proper context and perspective is good . Otherwise you end up
with 30k $ dac's !
A good thought is if a new DAC would be the best upgrade for the system
in total .

3. Beware of some cult designed dacs NOS and tubes etc ,they may
actually sound different :) this is of-course perceived as better by
some (as always )

If you have more than one digital source a DAC may be unavoidable , then
the MDAC seems to be a good performer for the money ?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=92112

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to