aubuti wrote: > I'd be interested to see the science behind it, because there is a > subtle difference in the methodology. But either way you're picking the > odd one out. The only difference with ABX is that the randomness is > limited to third sample (X). You're always getting either ABA or ABB. > > To turn the tables, why should the possibility of getting BBA or AAB > make more sense intuitively? > > Note also that in terms of identifying the different one (or the > matching one), the triangle's BAA and BAB are equivalent to ABX's ABB > and ABA, respectively.
Just that with ABX you know in advance that A and B are different? With triangle it could be AAB, BBA, BAB, ABA, ABB or BAA so you don't have the expectation bias? Or do I misunderstand ABX? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JerryS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38998 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98828 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
