Julf wrote: > Sorry to pick nits, but people who still think and claim digital is > digital are totally right in doing so - per definition. Your issue is > that sound is not digital, and in converting the digital data (that is > digital - by definition) that represents the sound into an analog > signal, the result is influenced by other things besides the digital > data.
If the shoe fits... Sorry for stepping on your toes. Simplifying things won't help here. Sometimes things are just more complex than just counting 0 and 1. People who're not accepting analog problems originated from digital domain issues are nothing less then clueless. But that's a different story. I'm just saying that measurements and conclusions related to the digital domain of the OP are wrong and misleading. A different thing are his analog domain (DAC outputs) measurements. Perhaps not perfect, but usually good enough to be relevant. Though also with those rather useful analog measurements the OP has a tendency to draw "final" and "general applicable" conclusions that would explain everything. That's at least from my perspective a bit of a simplistc view. He should avoid to put opinions into his measurements. Let the numbers speak. That's enough. ::: ' Touch Toolbox and more' (http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com) ::: by soundcheck ------------------------------------------------------------------------ soundcheck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34383 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99073 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
