Julf wrote: > > Neither the sampling theorem nor the fourier series (the transform is a > mathematical tool) assume (or require) "perfect" equipment. Semantics, but of course the maths stands regardless of physical equipment. The question is if the physical equipment conforms to the maths perfectly, given it isn't perfect.
Julf wrote: > > Real equipment will obey the mathematical equations So you say, but why is this not an assumption? As for two sine waves for IM, are you saying that ANY two frequencies tells us ALL we need to know about the devices IM distortion under all conditions? How can you assume there aren't frequency-dependent characteristics? Level-dependent characteristics? Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/ http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503. SB Touch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101003 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
