I've also had such disillusioning moments. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
Psychological bias is very real and very pervasive, but the fact sighted impressions are unreliable doesn't mean they are always wrong. Any more than failure to prove someone is guilty means they didn't do it! Process and governance and reliability of evidence is one thing, what is actually the case is another. http://www.soundstageultra.com/index.php/features-menu/general-interest-interviews-menu/455-searching-for-the-extreme-bruno-putzeys-of-mola-mola-hypex-and-grimm-audio-part-one "You might then have this DAC which listeners feel has a shine, that puts an unnatural shine everywhere, and then suddenly you find this noise modulation when digging deeper, and you realize that might be the answer for why." There is no mention of double blind listening in his working method - just because it's sighted doesn't mean it's WRONG. It just means you can't be sure it's right and that's a DIFFERENT THING! Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/ http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503. SB Touch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101342
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
