Mushroom_3 wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/13/apple_beats_and_fools_with_money/?page=1 > > I enjoyed this article, which manages to take a swipe at Apple, Beats > and Neil Young all in one go. Certainly a fun read, and in the main generally accurate.
But then he went and destroyed his credibility by dismissing 320kbps MP3 as audibly inadequate. And to make matters worse, in the very next paragraph he (correctly) points out that there is not a shred of evidence that hi-res sounds any better than 16/44 PCM, seemingly oblivious to the fact that there is not a shred of evidence that 16/44 sounds any better than competently-encoded 320kbps MP3 on normal music material. Transporter -> ATC SCM100A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101536 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
