"ralphpnj wrote: > Sometime around 1980 the high end audio discovered that the once lowly > cable could be magically transformed in a glorious cash cow, a cash cow > that never stopped giving. Of course even back then there were many > people who pointed out the so called "science" behind expensive cables > was not being used correctly, i.e. that once the proper cables were > installed in a given audio system any further cable upgrades were just > not worthwhile, but the money was just too good to ignore and so the > real science was replaced with glossy ads filled with guys in white lab > coats, pretty women and "white papers" filled with pseudo science. Then > came digital, which BY DESIGN does not behave the same as analog, > especially when it comes to cables but, as stated above, the "cable" > money was just too good to ignore and so more pseudo science was cooked > up to justify spending money on non-existent "problems". So now we have > a high end audio world that is almost completely filled with worthless > pseudo science and which has been feeding audiophiles this nonsense for > quite some time. However the money is still too good and so the nonsense > just continues to snowball, growing ever bigger with more and more > misinformation. A truly sad state of affairs.
I want my Kimber digital cable !!!!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jimmypowder's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=61215 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101584 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
