Mnyb wrote: > Exellent work , the number of downöoads suggest that more people tried > than actually did the survey :) > > You may have inspered some to test thier assumptions . > > The missunderstandings about digital audio are truly limitless , just > the other day some one asked for 352kHz support on USB for. Touch ?
Also doesn't help when manufacturers are clearly engaged in a "samplerate war" with 192, 352, 384, DSD128, DSD256, DSD512 at this point to sell hardware with presumably the software to follow. I think what happens to Pono should be interesting in the days ahead... I wonder what happened at this AES workshop in April? http://www.aes.org/events/136/workshops/?ID=3970 I do believe that doing the test opened some eyes to preconceived beliefs. I'll post the subjective comments ("testimonies") in Part III. Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective' audiophile blog. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101766
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
