pippin wrote: > > There is one risk remaining: especially the old Squeezebox models have a > rather small internal buffer so they are a bit more sensitive against > unstable connections compared to especially the smartphone Apps (but > TIDAL's web interface for me always was even more sensitive). > The Touch should be much less affected, though. >
@pippin, Could you elaborate on this. So my Transporter has a smaller internal buffer than my Touch or Radio. But why would the stream from Tidal place more demands on that buffer than streaming a 24/96 FLAC file to the same players from my local LMS. Why would the Transporter treat the internet stream different than the local stream? *Home:* VortexBox 4TB (2.3) > LMS 7.8 > Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio w/Battery (all ethernet) *Cottage:* VBA 3TB (2.3) > LMS 7.8 > Touch > Benchmark DAC I, Boom, Radio w/Battery (all ethernet except Radio) *Office:* Win7(64) > LMS 7.9 > Squeezelite *Spares:* Touch(3), Radio(3), Boom, SB3, CONTROLLER *Controllers:* iPhone6 & iPadAir2 (iPeng8 & Squeezepad), CONTROLLER, or SqueezePlay 7.8 on Win7(64) laptop *Files:* ripping: dbpoweramp > FLAC; post-rip: mp3tag, PerfectTunes; Streaming: Spotify ------------------------------------------------------------------------ garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103453 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
