ralphpnj wrote: > The plot thickens (pun intended). Could it be that Pono's "glorious" > sound with high resolution material is due it's less than stellar > reproduction of standard resolution material? Just saying.
Truthfully, this is not a big enough of a flaw to create a "glorious" sound difference, just one that could be reliably detected with certain program material by certain careful listeners, doing a listening test that is more sensitive than the usual casual listening. It is big enough to look impressive to casual readers, but to me it seems to be pointed in the wrong direction to impress their target market. I have to admit that I can't relate to the product's designers. Their thinking seems to have left the tracks my brain runs on with their phobia about using active correction (Inverse Feedback). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102976 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
