doctor_big wrote: 
> As an aside from all this nastiness, an observation - I honestly think
> that ABX is the tipping point on the seesaw between the Os and the S'. 
> Audiophiles mightily distrust ABX, and with good reason, I think.  I've
> taken part in two of those hateful experiments, and found myself utterly
> wamboozled and unable to concentrate on the music without thinking about
> the test.  "Is this this, or this?"  Perhaps practice helps?  I've also
> participated in blind AB tests at a prominent Canadian speaker
> manufacturer, and found them entertaining, informative and stress free. 
> Take what you will from that.  Anyway, I don't have a better, feasible,
> repeatable test to offer, so the standoff shall continue, yes?

Have you read 'ITU BS.1116'
(http://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BS.1116-3-201502-I/en) and 'BS.1534'
(http://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BS.1534-2-201406-I/en)?



"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to