arnyk wrote: > What constitutes a "Background in amplification circuit design?" > > > > Actually, the following statement: > > "Vacuum tubes have a place in the world but that place is no longer in > the world of audio equipment." > > appears to be in agreement with the modern technical consensus. it > appears to be in agreement with modern audio circuit design as practiced > by the mainstream. > > Please explain what is wrong with the above statement.
Arny - Thanks for coming to my defense. I think that you already know that this whole discussion has now become pointless. I have clearly won the argument and so jh901 has to resort to personal attacks (as in "you're not qualified.....blah, blah, blah"). As I stated earlier arguing with kool-aid drinking audiophiles is too much like shooting fish in a barrel. Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. & sub Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Energy sub Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0 Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar Garage: SB3-JVC compact system Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso Server: SBS on dedicated windows 7 computer w/2 Drobos 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
