DJanGo wrote: 
> In my opinion its quite simple to explain...
> 
> >   >   > 
  - Someone with some special interests meets someone with another
  > interest or knowledge
  - both of them are hardcoded in their meanings and no one will get
  > away from his statepoint.
  - eg - "i dont want to use the search engine - how to solve a
  > already solved Problem"
  - "I dont want to know how its working i dont care how i can find a
  > solution or even give supporters a handful Infos thats needed to
  > answer my question"
  - "You only get what you payed for" is a the all above statement
  > equal if the extra Money is worth to spend or not.
  > > > 

Not exactly. There are instances where one side of the argument is
clearly wrong or at the very least, mistaken. What you are saying is
that if one side of the argument is saying that 2+2=4 and the other side
is saying that 2+2=5 that they both are entitled to their opinions and
it simply a case of both of them being unwilling to yield.

Now please don't get me wrong - when the subject matter is in the area
of opinion and personal taste, like one movie being "better" than
another movie, then what you have written is correct. But discussions
technical issues should be based on facts and evidence and not opinions
and personal taste.

So when I state that it impossible, based on the science and technology
involved, for one properly functioning USB cable to "sound" better (i.e.
to produce a clearly detectable and better sound at the output of the
speaker) than another properly functioning USB cable, I am stating a
well known SCIENTIFIC FACT and not an opinion.

The fact that there are people who claim to hear a difference between
two USB cables doesn't change the FACT that this is impossible. All it
tells me is that these people are either lying or delusional. The ones
lying are the ones who can profit from lying (reviewers and
manufacturers) and ones who are delusional are the poor fools who are
helping the ones who lying to make their ill gotten profits.

On the other hand a discussion about the sound of one set of speakers
versus another set of speakers is one in which opinions and personal
tastes have a place.

Just wanted to clear that up.



Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. &
sub
Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub
Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1
& Energy sub
Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0
Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar
Garage: SB3-JVC compact system
Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso
Server: SBS on dedicated windows 7 computer w/2 Drobos
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103849

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to