jkeny wrote: > You are correct - I shouldn't have generalised your comments - > apologies. > > The Jitter ABX testing is not done on just one file which has 1000ns p-p > added jitter - it includes a number of such tests on files with > progressively lower simulated jitter levels & on some files imported > from a pro-audio site purported to have 6ps of simulated jitter. > > See '-*this post*-' > (http://www.head-fi.org/t/668878/jitter-correlation-to-audibility/165#post_9838363) > where he shows a relatively positive ABX result - Total: 10/12 (1.9%) on > two files path30n versus path30jr. Which generate the comments "That is > a really excellent result, the difference between the files is always > less than -90.3 dBFS (= 1 LSB in 16-bit resolution), except for a low > level "click" at the end of the file, and only rarely has peaks above > -96 dBFS." > > Anyway, the point of posting these ABX tests was his detailed > description of the training, focus & testing technique needed for a > successful audible differentiation - it was not about what the results > signify or don't signify.
Thanks jkeny for the reply and clarification. I'll have to look more into that thread! Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective' audiophile blog. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96407 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
