Archimago wrote: > Oh boy. I try to ask for evidence, point out inconsistencies, and > suggest areas where we might verify claims and all I get is finger > pointing and personal comments around "hammers & nail" cliches.There are no > inconsistencies - only in your understanding.
> No. I am not asking Swenson for measurements "produced for (me)". I am > asking the scientist/engineer/designer to demonstrate that *his claims > are true* for all (including myself) who may be interested in the > product before plunking $175+shipping.Surely that was the point of your own > suggestion that you would like to measure the device - to check if his claims are true?? I pointed out that your suggested measurement was bullshit & you still fail to understand why. So now you want something else "to demonstrate that *his claims are true" *- a complete logic failure on your part. If I may use another cliche "cart before horse" springs to mind. A full technical explanation of it's operation was given - so take it from there - how do you suggest that you will test it? > Not words, but some form of verification that real life improvements are > made. You clearly cannot provide that and can only speak hypothetically > based on some kind of -faith-. > > Good luck to you, sir.If you cannot understand the theory of operation then > you should be suggesting to do tests on something that you patently don't know how to test ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
