jh901 wrote: > Did you successfully discredit Dan Wright's Transporter mods? >
Link, please. > > Your fixation on "sighted evaluation" is special. > it may be special, and if it is, then that's a pity. It is science. > > Have your ever heard a difference in sound quality (speakers, acoustic > treatment, etc) without having to undergo double blind ABX? I have to admit that the above looks like good evidence of a lack of reading comprehension. Just to summarize: Hearing differences is so easy that it is trivial. There are at least 5 reasons that are almost always relevant, which result in hearing differences when: (a) Listening to the identical same music (b) Listening via the identical same system (c) Listening in the identical same room with (d) The identical same listener is listening (e) The listener is seated in the identical same place: The 5 reasons are: (1) Absence of a fixed reference sound. (2) Absence of level matching. (3) Absence of quick switching. (4) Absence of time synching fo the music or dialog when it is switched. (5) Being told, whether true or false, that the two listening paths being compared are different. So, how many times have you done all of these things right during your listening evaluations? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
