jkeny wrote: > ... > [/COLOR]In the comments Solderdude (a well known objectivist) said > "Playing the role of 'subjectivists advocate' > _the_conclusion:_'there_was_no_evidence_that_24-bit_audio_could_be_appreciably_differentiated_from_the_same_music_dithered_down_to_16-bits_using_a_basic_algorithm_' > may not be shared by the 15% who gave the correct answers." > "-We will never know IF the people that gave the correct answers truly > HEARD the differences or just guessed or analysed the files correctly-. > *This could only be done in a controlled environment with those who > answered correctly with a statistic more relevant blind test*." > > You did reply to him "Good idea with the 20; I'll see about putting > something together..." Have you followed this up? > > So, I find your comments in your internet blind test, unbalanced & > mathematically wildly incorrect.
Yes, of course I looked at those 20... http://archimago.blogspot.ca/2014/07/24-bit-vs-16-bit-audio-test-part-iia-20.html Thanks for reading so intently. Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective' audiophile blog. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
