Gandhi wrote: > We seem to have vastly different definitions of the word "honest". > Perhaps you would care to explain your definition? > > And by the way. Obviously the personal attacks are now back. They will > not help your case. Arguing your point using specific, clear, fact based > and logical arguments might. I see you added to your post after my reply. So let me be more specific: What I find dishonest in your position is the refusal to listen to this device as it doesn't have measurements. What I also find dishonest is the instant reply by both Wombat & you to my link Both of these show the depth of denial in your positions. We all know that only professionally administered, carefully controlled, large scale DBT would offer any semblance of proof & then it would probably be argued about We all know that whatever measurements are produced will be argued over
So, no, you are not looking for "proof" -you are looking for further points to argue over when, if you honestly wanted to get to the truth, you would just get the device & listen to it. Exactly as the sworn objectivist, Fitzcaraldo did in the link I gave These are not personal attacks - simply my opinion of your position. I know that when one's position is challenged it can feel like an attack, that's normal, I guess ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
