SBGK wrote: > thing is your understanding of physics is flawed, the theories don't > match reality. Unless you think that everyone who hears any differences > in digital playback is hearing things. Just like the global warming > theories haven't predicted the stall in global temperatures the theories > of digital audio can't predict the differences people hear.
Quite. But psychoacoustics can. And will. SBGK wrote: > real science would be trying to come up with theories to match the > evidence rather than ridiculing the evidence. This is clearly a misunderstanding. You seem to confuse 'observations' with 'evidence'. Evidence is what proves that observations reflect actual reality. Best Regards, Gandhi not often enough well recorded and mastered cds *|* dbpoweramp with accuraterip *|* flac *|* fanless asrock z77e-itx intel i5-3570t *|* ubuntu 12.04.1 lts 32-bit *|* lms 7.8.0 *|* brutefirdrc 3.0 (rewv5) *|* transporter (balanced out) *|* thule ia252b *|* audio physic scorpio *|* no fancy cables. *+* also some booms. *+* harmony 525s for them all, including waking the server from s3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gandhi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58909 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
