http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/24/opinion/the-case-for-teaching-ignorance.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=opinion-c-col-left-region®ion=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region
The above op-ed piece was published in today's New York Times and makes for some very interesting reading. However there are several ideas within the piece, that although very thought provoking can also be completely misunderstood and, of course, misused and misquoted. So my multi-part question/poll is: 1) how long before the above linked op-ed piece is mentioned or quoted in the high end audio press (print or online) and 2) how badly will the piece be misquoted/misunderstood, i.e. moving some scientific fact from it's proper place in the center of the island of knowledge to the shoreline? (read the piece and you will understand that last sentence) My guesses: 1) within a week and 2) very badly misquoted and also within a week since it will be in the same article that mentions the op-ed piece. Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. & sub Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Energy sub Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0 Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar Garage: SB3-JVC compact system Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso Server: SBS on dedicated windows 7 computer w/2 Drobos 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104178 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
