sckramer wrote: > The fact that it sounds better (and not in a "I just bought some audio > jewelry, it must sound better :D) --> compels be to like to be able to. >
Would love to see your double-blind ABX logs... :) > I'm researching how good an oscilloscope I should get... (of course I'm > getting the scope for many things besides this :D) > > Cause I really want to know also. Oscilloscopes are good for fairly high frequency work, but their linearity, resolution and signal-to-noise ratio are not very good. For audio work, you are much better off with a good sound card and software. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104518 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
