Julf wrote: > If they actually cared about real differences - but that would scare > away advertisers. Remember it is the advertisers, not the subscribers, > that pay for the audiorags. > > > > Indeed. And as I keep saying, having the headroom (given the word length > of modern DSP architectures) is not hard.
Yes but are these ovesampling filter chips in most DAC really DSP processors, they where not in the past they where som hardware implementation ? DSP would be floating point at some incredible rate and software then just output to some word length suitable for the DAC chip ? then all is well :) Funny enough i suspect a phone can best many DAC's in this regards as they seems to have some really cool DSP onboard (in fact i think my phone beats my first DAC in every other aspect as well ... ) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
