Julf wrote: > Yes and no - three times the cost is still three times the cost, even if > that cost keeps getting lower.
Well, 24/48k would be less than twice the capacity. But I just don't see this mattering. For the home user buying media the cost of getting them a 24/48 version on e.g. DVD-A is basically the same as doing a 16/44 version for them. I was disappointed that DVD-A didn't get more headway actually. The promise of more reliable rips, more choice of format, full metadata and artwork shipped alongside the audio; all good in my book. Anyway. I believe that for the streamers the quality matters less and lossy compression is ok. To be fair I might change my mind if someone started offering lossless streaming services. That might well become a one stop shop for all my music needs.. depending on price.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106593 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
