Mnyb wrote: > > Most of the real knowledge is often in dry reasearch papers . > Like our knowledge of human threshold for hearing limititations > distortion and such . > I simple can't find a good accessible laymans article about it . Science > was done with it decades ago and our organism has not evolved > significantly so it's stilll valid knowledge . > > But no audio magazine revisits these topics as they should do imo . > There is always a new generation . > Writing about basics is necessary. > > I don't think it's common that people entreanched in this magical > thinking change . But a good article such as this may stop some new > people getting recruited into to this trap . Unfortunately you can come up every week and add some sentense like "*QA is based entirely on science. Specifically, it is based on new findings in Neuroscience" and all solid critics based on recent hearing is ignored. I like Archimago uses the most spot on word you can use for these audiophile findings. I love it, it is fantastic! It is 'fluff' :)
Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=107057 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
