arnyk wrote:
> This is conditionally and not uncommonly false.
>
So a part or all of what I wrote ("this") is sometimes not true? What
exactly did you mean by "this"?
arnyk wrote:
> If the DAC is operating with an excessively high sample rate as is
> common with audiophiles, say 96 KHz and above, then an anti-imaging
> filter further down the signal chain operating at a more sane design
> frequency such as 44 KHz can still remove any audible imaging.
>
Assuming by "down the signal chain" you mean "after the DAC output", I
don't see how any of my statements contradict the above - some at the
least imply the above. Please explain further.
Check it, add to it! http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/
SB Touch
------------------------------------------------------------------------
darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106979
_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
