alfista wrote: 
> Who knows, but he obviously knows how to cater to a specific market.
> Granted he did quite a bit more than just add bling to the product, but
> a shiny box, some fancy interfaces and, just as important as the
> engineering, a rather obscene price tag is what made it sell to that
> particular clientel. Those who only cared about function and what
> actually comes out of the speakers were just as happy with an SB3 that
> for most purposes did the job equally well.
> The Transporter is a very cleverly engineered device that would never
> have appealed to the intended market without some of the cleverly added
> trim.

The Transporter WAS expensive: that's why I bought my first one
second-hand (it still works perfectly), & my spares as end-of-line fire
sale items on eBay.

Dave :)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Golden Earring's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66646
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to