Wombat wrote: 
> Before you declare your Brokkoly sounding incompetent with 16bit
> material did you even try what i suggested or do you simply enjoy
> fishing around here?

Hi Wombat!

Sorry I missed your post during the panic attack I experienced after
extracting myself from the accursed "Do loop". It was tough.

I was actually being somewhat flippant myself when I said that the 24/48
version of Automatic For The People sounded better than my 16/44.1. It
does but I am quite happy to attribute the difference in audio quality
to the mastering of the recording rather than the size of the box it was
wrapped up in under my Xmas tree.

I haven't converted it to 16/44.1 precisely because I agree with you
that it is going to sound the same as when encoded as 24/48 & don't want
to spend the time fiddling with it . But being an innately obliging chap
I shall do so if you press me again on the matter.

For the record, I have never said that I consider the Brokkoly
incompetent with 16/44.1 material - on the contrary, I find that it does
a better job than the DAC in my Transporter, which I appreciate is a
position some forum members hold to be somehow impossible in the
bewildering universe we find ourselves in. So be it.

Still got you top of my candidate list for the demanding role of
bluffing my listening panel convincingly...

Hope you're having a good weekend.

Dave :)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Golden Earring's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66646
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to