Golden Earring wrote: > This does not necessarily imply that high sample rates are bad per se. > I'm still trying to catch up on the theoretical stuff, but I've had a > hint that there may be frequency domain vs. time domain issues in > establishing the best size box to stick a genuine recording into.
Frequency and time domains are just different aspects of the same thing. > Whether any such considerations would be audible in practice cannot be > determined when only "fake" examples are currently available. mark Waldrep (of AIX Records) is producing a book and recording with genuine recordings in different formats and sample rates to allow for a fair comparison. 'Link here.' (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1856656547/music-and-audio-a-user-guide-to-better-sound) "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
