|
Here's the director of the FBI destroyed this person life
almost because of ethics..... without the benchmark of properly measuring
reality from (personal) opinion (ethics, ones image, belief) we are all still
today very much exposured to high levels of risk....
Appointed director of the FBI how ethical was Louis
Freeh???? "Mr. Trulock's suit sets forth the violation
of his First Amendment free-speech rights because the actions of Freeh
and other FBI officials were conducted in retaliation
for the magazine article."
chris hardy 281 227 8898
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 10:38
AM
Subject: SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST
FORMER FBI DIRECTOR LOUIS FREEH
For Immediate Release
Dec 4, 2002 |
Contact: Press
Office
202-646-5172
|
SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST FORMER FBI DIRECTOR
LOUIS FREEH
Judicial Watch Wins Victory on
Behalf of Client Notra Trulock
Case to
Proceed to Discovery
(Washington, DC)
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and
prosecutes government corruption and abuse, said today that the United
States Supreme Court rejected former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s claim of
immunity in a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch on behalf of its client
Notra Trulock.
Mr. Trulock is the former Director of
Intelligence for the Department of Energy who “blew the whistle” on
Communist Chinese espionage activity at U.S. nuclear laboratories. After
leaving government service, Mr. Trulock wrote an article in a July 2000
edition of the magazine National Review, which was critical of
the Clinton administration, Louis Freeh, the FBI, and other federal law
enforcement agencies for repeatedly ignoring his warnings about
espionage. Later that month, FBI agents unlawfully searched Mr.
Trulock’s home computer files and confiscated his computer hard drive.
Mr. Trulock's suit sets forth the violation of his First Amendment
free-speech rights because the actions of Freeh and other FBI officials
were conducted in retaliation for the magazine article.
As part
of the FBI’s campaign of harassment and intimidation, officials kept Mr.
Trulock's computer hard drive for two years. Mr. Trulock’s private,
personal records were stored on the hard drive, including research about
a genetic disorder from which his son suffers, as well as his personal
financial information.
“The Supreme Court has sent a clear signal
to all senior law enforcement officers and federal officials: ‘You are
not above the law!,” and that message is consistent with our motto at
Judicial Watch. We look forward to taking Mr. Freeh’s deposition and
uncovering the facts that will bring justice for the damages and
suffering Mr. Trulock has experienced,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman
and General Counsel Larry Klayman.
� Copyright 1997-2002, Judicial Watch,
Inc.
| --- You are currently
subscribed to infonet as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
