Julie Anne
Dilley
Audit and Attest
Standards
American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants
1211 Avenue of the
Re: Proposed Statement on
Auditing Standards – Reporting on a Entity’s Internal Control over Financial
Reporting in Conjunction with the Financial Statement
Audit
Dear Ms.
Dilley:
I believe the requirements
of this Proposed Statement miss the intent of President and Congress. Further, the Statement appears
internally inconsistent, contrary to the public good and
self-serving.
When President
ushered in Corporate Governance on
Reform should begin
with accountability, and reform should start at the top. The chief executive
officer has a daily duty to oversee the entire enterprise, the entire firm, and
therefore, bears a unique responsibility for serving shareholder
interests.”
It is interesting to note
that the term “shareholder’ does not appear in the referenced document. While
the Proposed Statement suggests public documents focus on management’s
assertions, it contains little, if any, discussion of the auditor’s review of
management’s work, especially in shareholder equity protection.
There seems to be an
incredible amount of regulatory efforts on internal controls being documented
and attested. Why didn’t internal controls keep any of the litanies of corporate
failures from happening? Does a documenting and attestation of internal controls
improve that lack of public trust? I suggest a document that does not even
recognize the shareholder falls far short of what is
requirement.
One may suggest the auditor
does not have that responsibility for shareholder equity protection, yet the
auditor is tasked with meeting these regulatory requirements. Who is to assume
these responsibilities?
The SEC seems to have
stepped up to the plate in Final rules published
Respectfully,
Bill Reid
