On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 12:47 PM John Johansen
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/24/23 09:14, Paul Moore wrote:
> > The get_task_exe_file() function locks the given task with task_lock()
> > which when used inside audit_exe_compare() can cause deadlocks on
> > systems that generate audit records when the task_lock() is held. We
> > resolve this problem with two changes: ignoring those cases where the
> > task being audited is not the current task, and changing our approach
> > to obtaining the executable file struct to not require task_lock().
> >
> > With the intent of the audit exe filter being to filter on audit events
> > generated by processes started by the specified executable, it makes
> > sense that we would only want to use the exe filter on audit records
> > associated with the currently executing process, e.g. @current.  If
> > we are asked to filter records using a non-@current task_struct we can
> > safely ignore the exe filter without negatively impacting the admin's
> > expectations for the exe filter.
> >
> > Knowing that we only have to worry about filtering the currently
> > executing task in audit_exe_compare() we can do away with the
> > task_lock() and call get_mm_exe_file() with @current->mm directly.
> >
> > Cc: <[email protected]>
> > Fixes: 5efc244346f9 ("audit: fix exe_file access in audit_exe_compare")
> > Reported-by: Andreas Steinmetz <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
>
> looks good to me
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <[email protected]>
>
> > ---
> > - v2
> > * dropped mmget()/mmput()
> >
> > - v1
> > * initial revision
> > ---
> >   kernel/audit_watch.c | 7 ++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/audit_watch.c b/kernel/audit_watch.c
> > index 65075f1e4ac8..99da4ee8e597 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit_watch.c
> > +++ b/kernel/audit_watch.c
> > @@ -527,11 +527,16 @@ int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct 
> > audit_fsnotify_mark *mark)
> >       unsigned long ino;
> >       dev_t dev;
> >
> > -     exe_file = get_task_exe_file(tsk);
> > +     /* only do exe filtering if we are recording @current events/records 
> > */
> > +     if (tsk != current)
> > +             return 0;
> > +
> > +     exe_file = get_mm_exe_file(current->mm);

Hmmm.  I don't know why I didn't think of this earlier, but we should
probably protect against @current->mm being NULL, right?

> >       if (!exe_file)
> >               return 0;
> >       ino = file_inode(exe_file)->i_ino;
> >       dev = file_inode(exe_file)->i_sb->s_dev;
> >       fput(exe_file);
> > +
> >       return audit_mark_compare(mark, ino, dev);
> >   }

-- 
paul-moore.com

Reply via email to