On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 9:22 PM Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, Richard did provide a reviewed-by tag on the v1 patch, but v2 has > enough changes that I don't think we can reasonably carry that forward; > of course Richard re-review this iteration and provide a new tag. I'm > going to remove it for now. > > Al never provided an explicit reviewed-by tag; simply commenting on a > patch is not the same as providing a 'Reviewed-by', the reviewer will > provide an explicit 'Reviewed-by' tag in their email. I'm going to > remove Al's tag too.
I'm sorry about that, I was just trying to give credit to the ones who helped. Thanks for clarifying the expected review process, I appreciate it! > Other than those issues, I think this looks much better than v1, I'm > going to merge this into audit/dev now, thanks! Thanks, Paul! - Ricardo
