Fix a logical issue that could have been visible if the source or the destination of a rename/link action was allowed for either the source or the destination but not both. However, this logical bug is unreachable because either: - the rename/link action is allowed by the access rights tied to the same mount point (without relying on access rights in a parent mount point) and the access request is allowed (i.e. allow_parent1 and allow_parent2 are true in current_check_refer_path), - or a common rule in a parent mount point updates the access check for the source and the destination (cf. is_access_to_paths_allowed).
See the following layout1.refer_part_mount_tree_is_allowed test that work with and without this fix. This fix does not impact current code but it is required for the audit support. Cc: Günther Noack <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] --- Changes since v2: - New patch. --- security/landlock/fs.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c index 171012efb559..ddadc465581e 100644 --- a/security/landlock/fs.c +++ b/security/landlock/fs.c @@ -567,6 +567,12 @@ static void test_no_more_access(struct kunit *const test) #undef NMA_TRUE #undef NMA_FALSE +static bool is_layer_masks_allowed( + layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS]) +{ + return !memchr_inv(layer_masks, 0, sizeof(*layer_masks)); +} + /* * Removes @layer_masks accesses that are not requested. * @@ -584,7 +590,8 @@ scope_to_request(const access_mask_t access_request, for_each_clear_bit(access_bit, &access_req, ARRAY_SIZE(*layer_masks)) (*layer_masks)[access_bit] = 0; - return !memchr_inv(layer_masks, 0, sizeof(*layer_masks)); + + return is_layer_masks_allowed(layer_masks); } #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK_KUNIT_TEST @@ -773,9 +780,14 @@ static bool is_access_to_paths_allowed( if (WARN_ON_ONCE(domain->num_layers < 1 || !layer_masks_parent1)) return false; + allowed_parent1 = is_layer_masks_allowed(layer_masks_parent1); + if (unlikely(layer_masks_parent2)) { if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dentry_child1)) return false; + + allowed_parent2 = is_layer_masks_allowed(layer_masks_parent2); + /* * For a double request, first check for potential privilege * escalation by looking at domain handled accesses (which are -- 2.47.1
