On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 at 11:58, Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If we go that way, do you see any problems with treating
> osf_{ufs,cdfs}_mount() in the same manner?  Yes, these are pathnames,

Hmm. In those cases, the ENAMETOOLONG thing actually does make sense -
exactly because they are pathnames.

So I think that in those two places using getname() is fairly natural
and gets us the natural error handling too. No?

              Linus

Reply via email to